Steve Fisher - What is Political Sociology?
The critical study of the major sociological approaches to politics and their application to the following topics: the social bases of political identities, forms of state and organization of interests, the sources and distribution of political power, political transformations.
This raises the question - what is/are politics?,
The process of determining who gets, what, when, and how. (Harold Laswell)
Also, what sociological approaches are there?
Marx
Weber
Elite Theory
Pluralism
Rational Choice
Political Culture
Post-modernist
Historical, Functionalist ?
Mid-range theories
So, more broadly, political sociology is the study of the social circumstances of politics, that is how politics both is shaped by and shapes other events in societies. (Orum)
1. Marxist Political Sociology
Economic relations are paramount politics is about the struggle between classes defined by the ownership of the means of production.
State can take various forms:
Instrumental - acting as a tool of the capitalist class to oppress the proletariat.
Arbiter - managing the struggle between states [question of how autonomous the state is (Milliband vs. Poulantzas)]
Functionalist - creating the conditions for capital accumulation (e.g. imperialism)
Problem: Why has there been no revolution or even much sign of working class consciousness?
False-consciousness.
Capitalism hasnt reached its logical conclusion.
2. Weberian Political Sociology
Rejected economic determinism the state is autonomous.
Trend towards increasing rationalization and bureaucratization.
Democracy is a means for holding the state bureaucracy to account.
Power relations exist throughout society but politics, which is the struggle for power, is mainly at the state level.
3. Elite Theories
Defining proposition: (Political) power is inevitably concentrated in an elite.
There is always a ruling class and this does not depend on economic power.
Masses need leaders to organize them (Michels Iron Law of Oligarchy).
Liberal democracy and the idea of popular representation is a sham (Pareto, C. Wright Mills) or at best a means of changing government (Schumpeter)
Collective action problem is more easily resolved by a few vested interests than by the masses (Olson).
Similar conception of the state to Marxists but without economic determinism.
Pluralists argue that elite theorists are wrong: not oligarchy but polyarchy e.g. Dahls study of community power in New Haven.
4. Rational Choice
Focus on individuals with an assumption of rationality - behaviour is consistent and goal directed.
Theories can either be:
Thick - actors are assumed to maximize wealth and power (fungible goods).
or Thin - nature of preferences (except transitivity) is left unspecified.
Emphasis on the role of institutions and decision making rules on political behaviour.
Common features of political life (such as high voter turnout, social movements and policy stability) are actually surprising.
5. Cultural Explanations
Defining proposition: The culture in a society is an important determinant of social and political outcomes.
Examples:
Protestantism and the Spirit of Capitalism (Weber)
Democracy depends on Civic Culture (Almond and Verba)
Social Capital strengthens Democracy and the Economy (Putnam, also Tocqueville)
Canadian deference and US participation cultures explain differences the two countries (Continental DivideLipset)
Post-materialism (Inglehart)
6. Postmodernism
There has been a recent and major change in the structure of society and the nature of politics.
Society is much more fragmented (e.g. decline in class cohesion, multiculturalism, changing gender roles)
State is weaker and less relevant (e.g. globalization)
However, postmodernism (especially Foucault) goes further than this, claiming that . . .
social identities and even scientific knowledge do not represent any objective reality but are socially constructed
e.g. sexuality, gender, ethnicity
social distinctions are the result of power relations
e.g. mental health, deviance
"power is everywhere" (Foucault)
7. Power
The major question throughout is where does power reside. But the concept of power is complicated.
Lukes Three Dimensional View:
1. Ability to make decisions go your way in an observable conflict.
"a successful attempt by A to get B to do something he [or she] would not otherwise do" (Dahl).
2. Ability to control what issues get decided upon.
e.g. Presidential veto
3. Ability to influence the preferences of others.
"A exercises power over B when A affects B in a manner contrary to Bs interests."
e.g. media impact, agenda-setting, Crenson study of air pollution.
Foucault - Power is not held by anyone but diffuse and everywhere in society.
These definitions raise important issues of testability.
8. Social Science Methodology
Social Scientists believe in testing hypotheses. This implies (according to King, Keohane and Verba, 1994) we need to . . .
construct falsifiable hypotheses (Popper)
e.g. Foucault - "power is everywhere" is not testable
build internally consistent theories with observable consequences
have concepts that are transparent and measurable
e.g. Social capital and interpersonal trust
select dependent variables that are independent
e.g. Putnam - does culture cause democratic stability or vice versa?
not select observations based on the dependent variable
e.g. Scokpol - need to look at cases of no revolution
need a dependent variable that represents the variation we wish to explain
e.g. turnout between countries or at individual level
Note that this does not imply:
quantitative research is better than qualitative research
must use formal or rational choice theories
philosophical critiques or normative issues are not important