2004 Ouse Study.[1]
Conclusions of the May testing
groups.
The object
of the tests is to continue evaluating the effects of human activity on the
quality of
Test
results- see spreadsheet
Weather
conditions
Weather
during the sampling collection was showery with average daytime temperatures of
.14º.
Groups
commented on the values obtained as follows:
|
Clarity: Clarity can be
caused by dirt and algae in the river.
The effects that can be caused from clarity is: the prevention of
photosynthesis to the river plant, as the light is unable to pass through the
water. The major effects from this
will be a lack of oxygen in the water will cause the wildlife within the
river to die. We found that site
E (embankment) had the lowest clarity compared to the others. Although at site C (behind college) the
clarity was low as well. The reasons
for site E having a low clarity may be due to: The footbridge running across
site E and with the recent rain any waste will have been washed off in to the
river.
Jode/trace |
|
pH: pH can be caused by
atmospheric pollution. Extreme pH’s
will have an adverse effect to plant and animal life. The pH level will also effect whether
animals can reproduce (fish egg hatching)
We
found that at all sites there wasn’t a great deal of fluctuation and all
levels remained within a reasonable limit.
Jode/Trace |
|
Nitrate Nitrates
in river water often come from nitrogenous fertilizers used by farmers. Nitrates are very soluble and may move down
through the soil horizons into the groundwater. High nitrate levels in the water lead to
eutrophication in the water.
Eutrophication leads to a rapid algae growth in the water, which
causes the oxygen levels to decrease as well as competition for light to
occur. Although algae photosynthesise
they severely reduce the amount of light in the water by blanketing the
surface. Dead algae are broken up by
aerobic bacteria which use up much of the oxygen in the water. As oxygen levels decrease, BOD is
increased (biochemical oxygen demand) meaning many plants and animals die,
causing the break down of many food chains. We tested
water samples from five different points along the River Ouse, as it passes
through These
results show that the nitrate levels in the River Ouse in Investigators:
Neill Campbell and Sam Hammond |
|
Phosphate Phosphate:
Phosphates are used in agriculture, domestic settings and also industry. They may appear in river water samples as a
chemical input. High readings would
indicate that they have been added to the water through agricultural runoff
or industrial or domestic effluent. If excessive levels are present it can lead to eutrophication
and increased algal bloom. This may
lead to competition for light which may cause plants to die and decay. The resulting detritus will lead to more
decomposition which will use up more oxygen and lead to an increased
biological oxygen demand. In extreme conditions anaerobic bacteria will
thrive and release NH4, CH4, H2S into the water; aerobes such as invertebrates
and fish will die. Due to the different collection points for the
water samples, we expected to see a slight increase in the phosphate levels
due to the different land uses along the course of the river. A previous
study highlighted the fact that a commercial Car Wash had temporarily
discharged their waste water into the river, leading to increased phosphate
levels over a period of a few weeks. The general
trend along the testing points on the river revealed a slight increase in the
phosphate levels as the river passed through Investigators: LK/KG |
|
Nitrite
is a
product of the nitrogen cycle; it results from the decomposition of natural sources,
such as leaves, roots and plants, through the process of nitrification. It
has little or no effect on the environment. The closer to arable land the
samples were taken from, we expected to find higher concentrations of
nitrite. There is
little variation found in all samples taken, except in samples E and D; this
could be due to the build up of concentration levels during its transition
through the more built up areas of MM. SM.
KC. LB |
|
Chlorine
does not
appear naturally in water but is added to drinking water by water companies.
It can be considerably damaging to the environment. The sample taken from
more built up areas were expected to contain higher concentration levels of
chlorine. There was very little variation found in the samples taken, except
in sample E; this could be due to the build up of concentration levels during
its transition through the more built up areas of MM. SM.
KC. LB |
|
Chloride 1) Chloride is found in the form of
sodium, salt. This is from surface run
off, obtained through precipitation washing the salt used from the roads
gritted during the winter months. 2) Excess sodium chloride can have
osmotic effects on the environment. 3) Expect to find high levels of
sodium chloride in built up areas. 4) At site A there were low levels of
sodium chloride. Site D had the
highest level of sodium chloride, 5) Site A is an area away from roads
which contain the lowest level of sodium chloride. The sodium chloride levels increased as
samples were taken along the river at various points in higher built up
areas. 6) Ben Young & Karalyne
Donoghue |
|
2004 Ouse Study |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
J/T |
|
S/N |
K/L |
K/B |
|
KC/LB/SM |
|
|
|
Site |
Clarity % |
pH |
Nitrate |
Phosphate |
Cl as NaCl |
Sulphate |
Nitrite |
Chlorine |
|
|
|
|
|
mg l |
mg l |
mg l |
mg l |
mg l |
|
|
|
A |
100 |
7.2 |
10 |
4.10 |
160 |
|
0.023 |
0.02 |
|
|
B |
100 |
7.2 |
10 |
5.60 |
320 |
|
0.02 |
0.05 |
|
|
C |
97 |
7.2 |
10 |
5.60 |
320 |
|
0.022 |
0.02 |
|
|
E |
95 |
6.4 |
10 |
13.30 |
320 |
|
0.044 |
0.12 |
|
|
D |
100 |
7.1 |
10 |
9.70 |
480 |
|
0.059 |
0.02 |
|
[1] Relate to outcome 4 (ecological and evolutionary science)
“Demonstrate an understanding of issues surrounding
atmospheric and water pollution.”