Latest News / Meetings

 

Swindon TUC press Release February 12th 2006

Council Housing

A delegation representing trades unions from Swindon (TGWU, GMB, UNISON and Swindon TUC), joined 1,300 trades unionists and Council tenants in London on February 8th, for a rally and Lobby of Parliament. The event was part of the national campaign to win the right of Councils to direct investment in Council housing.

The government has attempted to dispense with Council housing by pressuring tenants to accept:

·        Transfer of their housing to private companies or Housing Associations;

·        Improvement of the stock by way of the Private Finance Initiative (the method by which we were given a new hospital with too few beds);

·        Arms Length Management Organisations (an idea dreamed up to avoid giving tenants the right to ballot as they have if faced with transfer).

The government has attempted to cajole and bludgeon tenants into accepting transfer, in some cases offering to write off housing debt, or by the more stark method of giving them the “choice” of modernisation of stock if they vote 'yes', and no improvements if they vote ‘no’.

The Defend Council Housing campaign which has the support of tenants, unions and many Labour MPs, has called the government’s bluff. If it talks of ‘choice’ for tenants, how can it deny tenants’ improvements if they chose to stay with their Council’s? Hence, they have put forward the demand for the ‘fourth option’, direct investment in Council housing. This demand was overwhelmingly supported by the Labour Party conference, but the Blair dictatorship has thus far ignored the Labour conference.

More than 200 MPs have thus far supported early day motions in support of the ‘fourth option’. Unfortunately neither of Swindon’s MPs have signed them. The delegation from Swindon therefore met the two MPs to press them to support direct investment.

In the case of Swindon, the raising of the standard of the Council’s housing stock is on course for completion by 2008. So the problem for us is the shortage of Council accommodation. More than 6,000 individuals and families are on the waiting list.

Michael Wills, informed the delegation that he did not entirely agree with the fourth option, but he would write to the relevant Minister to inform him of our point of view. Anne Snelgrove expressed her opposition to Council’s building new stock. She thought this was better done by Housing Action Trusts or businesses, which are apparently ‘more efficient’. She said she was in favour of government intervention, but not the right of Councils to build new stock.

In practice Councils are are prevented from doing so because they would be financially penalised is they chose to do so. That is why last year there were 400 Council units built in the entire country.

Swindon TUC Secretary Martin Wicks said:

“In reality there is no way that the housing market will provide ‘affordable housing’. Whilst we have a housing crisis in this town, all that is being built is expensive accommodation which many local people cannot afford. The only way that this crisis is liable to be addressed is by a return to Council House building. Ironically, when we attended the rally after meeting our MPs we heard Gerald Kauffman, an old right wing Labour MP, demanding of the government the right for Councils to build new stock. If he can see the need for this, why can’t our MP’s? It seems that supporters of Blair are ideologically opposed to social provision of housing.”

For further comment ring Martin Wicks on: 07786 394593

Visit the Defend Council Housing website at: www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk

 

Swindon TUC press Release 12th December 2005

According to yesterday’s Observer, the Primary Care Trust in Swindon has suggested that GPs should not make any “routine” referrals of patients for hospital care until January 16th “to avoid paying extra”, as they have to save £2.45 million.

Swindon TUC Secretary Martin Wicks commented:

“This appears to be part of the generalised financial crisis which is sweeping through the NHS at the national level. However, the delay of referrals is almost certainly related to the government’s waiting list targets. In order to hit the target people are to be left in pain for longer. So-called routine referrals can include things like hip replacements.”

“This crisis is of the government’s making, owing to its ‘marketisation’ of this public service, and its ‘payment by results’ system. One of the lunacies of the current situation is that Trusts who treat ‘too many’ patients get penalised for doing so.”

Swindon TUC is supporting the new campaign, Keep Our NHS Public (www.keepournhspublic.com ) which is campaigning against the privatisation of services and a ‘health market’.

For further comment contact Martin Wicks on 07786 394593

See below an article on the NHS crisis from the latest Swindon TUC Newsletter

NHS Crisis Deepens        

In the last issue we wrote about the Keep Our NHS public campaign. Below we show an initial list of local signatories to the statement launching the campaign. Please let us know if you would like to add your name to the list.

The crisis we reported on in issue 6 has deepened. News has emerged that one quarter of the country’s trusts are forecasting deficits that total £948 million, with an overall forecast of £623 million deficit.

The government has told trusts that they have to break even, and they are talking of sending “hit squads” around the country. However, these deficits are not the result of “inefficiency”. In many cases trusts are in deficit because they have treated too many patients. Because the government is treating the NHS like a market for goods, trusts can be penalised for treating “too many” sick people.

As a result of this situation, all around the country cuts, including job losses are being pushed through. So great is the crisis that East Suffolk PCT was proposing to negotiate with the unions deferment of next March wages until April!

Cuts in the most cashed strapped trusts are being proposed as we move into a winter which is forecast to be colder than usual.

News has emerged in the Guardian that hospitals are delaying ‘non-emergency’ treatment in order to slow spending.

The University Hospital of North Staffordshire, in Stoke-on-Trent, has been told it must stop operating on women needing gynaecological treatment who had been on its waiting list for only two months. The PCTs said they would refuse to pay for the work unless the women were kept waiting for nearly six months - the government's target maximum. By delaying treatment, spending is postponed into the next financial year.

A spokesman said the hospital sent letters to 528 patients this week cancelling bookings for operations before March 31 and offering appointments in the new financial year.

In London, Hammersmith and Fulham PCT has agreed a business plan that also slows down treatment. "The risk in this area continues to be the treatment of patients faster than is required by the targets and therefore at greater expense than our funding," the plan says. To reduce this risk, we are requiring the main acute trusts to treat non-urgent elective patients within an average of five months." A spokesman for North West Thames strategic health authority said the PCT's policy is in line with other trusts in London.

Keep our NHS public!

Add your name to the list below

The NHS stands at a crossroads. For nearly 60 years Britain has enjoyed a National Health Service that strives to be comprehensive, accessible and high value for money. Now, government reforms threaten both the ethos of the NHS, and the planned and equitable way in which it delivers care to patients.

At the heart of the changes is the creation of a market that welcomes profit-driven international corporations who answer to shareholders, not patients. This market will compel hospitals and health professionals, who have traditionally cooperated to deliver healthcare, to compete with each other and with the private sector. Far from supporting the NHS, the private sector is in competition with it, and is already draining away resources and staff.

If these reforms continue the nature of the health system will change radically:

Income and profits will increasingly come before patient needs and clinical considerations.

Greater inequalities in healthcare will appear, as profitable services and patients attract money at the expense of unprofitable ones.

Forced market competition among NHS hospitals and primary care will break up the NHS as a network of collaborating bodies that share resources and information. Our integrated NHS GP service will be lost. There will be winners and losers, with some units and even entire hospitals having to close. We are already seeing job losses and bed closures in NHS hospitals.

Even more of the new money allocated to health will be diverted to shareholders and company profits, and wasted on the huge administrative costs associated with establishing and running a market.

There is no evidence that these reforms will improve the health service. And in spite of increased spending on healthcare, and government commitment to "patient choice", the end result of these reforms will undermine the choice that is most important to patients - access to comprehensive, trustworthy, and local health services.

The situation is grave. The value of the NHS is immense and cannot be mirrored by the private sector. It must be kept in public hands, serving the interests of all patients and the broader public, not the private healthcare industry.

We therefore call on organisations, healthcare workers, patients and the public to campaign to protect the NHS from further privatisation and fragmentation, and to keep our NHS public.

Local signatories

Kevin Brandstatter, GMB Organiser

Alison Cox-Ingram, Secretary Wilts & Swindon UNISON Health branch

Bob Cretchley, Secretary Swindon BC UNISON

Michelle Gordon, Secretary Wiltshire & Swindon GMB (Labour Councillor, Didcot)

Brian Jones, Swindon BC UNISON Exec member

Hugh Kirkbride, TGWU Regional Industrial Organiser

Anne Lubin, Health campaigner

Bridget Lucas, Registered General Nurse Swindon PCT

John Newman, Wroughton Parish Councillor

Ted Poole, Amicus delegate Swindon TUC

Andy Prendergast, GMB organiser (Labour Party member)

Jean Saunders, ex-NHS orthodontist

Peter Smith, Secretary Swindon NUT

Gary Weston, Secretary Swindon RMT

John Wignall, Swindon BC UNISON Exec member

Martin Wicks, Secretary Swindon TUC

To add your name to the list email us at: swindontuc@btinternet.com

Parliamentary Lobby – Invest in Council Housing

Lobby of Parliament, Wednesday Feb 8 2006


A Rally and lobby of Parliament will take place on February 8th, to demand the right of tenants to the ‘fourth option’ – the right of Councils to invest in Council housing. Despite talking of ‘tenant choice’ the government has used every pressure to force tenants to agree to the transfer of their housing to private companies, housing associations, or ‘arms length management companies’. Yet with more and more tenants voting against transfer, tenants, local Councillors and local government unions are demanding that the government abandon their support for Tory policy which they have maintained for the last eight years.

 

Councils should have the right to invest directly in their housing stock. Moreover, the lack of ‘affordable housing’ will only be tackled if Councils are given the right to start building Council housing once again.

 

Local unions in Swindon will be taking a delegation to participate in the rally and to lobby our 2 MPs. (Transport details will be published later). Let us know if you would like to join the lobby.

 

For background to the issues, go to our E-Newsletter page and download Issue 7.

 

Visit the Defend Council Housing website at: www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk

 

 

 

Return to Home

 

1